Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Shin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator with no opposing !votes. The Bushranger One ping only 16:00, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Peter Shin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

What a horrible looking article. When I read it on pop ups I presumed it to be a disambiguation page. Laun chba  ller  15:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. The nomination is hardly policy based. I think winning an Annie Award shows notability. Plus, he's been nominated for four Emmy Awards. Crappy article, yeah, but he's probably notable.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 23:48, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Patched the article up.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 23:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Fantastic work - I am happy to withdraw.-- Laun  chba  ller  06:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. - 4 emmy noms + 2 wins (annie, daytime emmy), notable indeed, article looks good now, well done Trescott.--Stemoc (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Person sounds notable from winning and being nominated for awards.  Dough 48  72  00:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.