Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Sprigg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Peter Sprigg

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I doubt he is notable, and he is certainly not notable as a scientist. Wikisaurus (talk) 23:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --  lomrjyo  🐱(✉ • 📝) 00:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. --  lomrjyo  🐱(✉ • 📝) 00:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 11:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 11:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 11:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * delete clearly not notable, neither as academic nor in general. Senior fellows are not notable by themselves and he does not seem to have done anything notable, except offer his opinion on a political issue. --hroest 19:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:GNG due to a lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources, and does not meet any WP:SNGs imv Atlantic306 (talk) 02:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. His employer, Family Research Council, is certainly notable but notability is not inherited. Based on his wikipedia biography and a quick google search I can't see anything that would satisfy WP:NACADEMIC.VR talk 03:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.