Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Vyncke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  16:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Peter Vyncke

 * – ( View AfD View log )

G11 borderline promotional article for a non notable businessman who a WP:BEFORE shows lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Optimizing the google translate, the references used in the article are either mentions in passing, sponsored posts, sources that don’t even discuss the article’s subject & interviews in all this is a WP:GNG fail as well as an WP:ANYBIO fail. Celestina007 (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:59, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: I have added 4 references with ISBN book number using Google Books. Geertivp (talk) 09:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although both this article and Vyncke have a distinctly promotional tone, I don't think there is any real notability argument based on the coverage in De Tijd and VRT alone. I have added advert tags to both articles. I see that produced both articles and that some promotional content has already been stripped from Vyncke by another user and I'd really urge him to avoid to appearance of a WP:CONFLICTOFINTEREST. —Brigade Piron (talk) 11:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.