Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter W. G. Jennings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Peter W. G. Jennings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mostly unreferenced WP:Vanispamcruftisement for author who doesn't yet meet WP:AUTHOR, producer who doesn't yet meet WP:CREATIVE, presenter of a monthly community cable show who doesn't yet meet WP:ENTERTAINER, and businessman who doesn't yet meet WP:BIO. No significant coverage for him online from WP:Secondary, WP:Reliable sources, just a few mentions in local press of the shark book published two months ago, but mostly focused on the attack victim, rather than on his role as co-author. Article was apparently written by a relative of the TV presenter whose show he produces. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 05:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Bazj (talk) 11:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as mentioned, no signs of even minimally better here. If so, delete for now at best. SwisterTwister   talk  23:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. None of this gets over Wikipedia's inclusion standards for that class of human activity, and the referencing is virtually all primary sources that can never support notability by themselves — so even if the claims did meet any inclusion criteria, the article still wouldn't be keepable if referenced this way. Bearcat (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.