Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter and Rosemary Grant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Nomination withdrawn after article rewritten. --Nlu (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Peter and Rosemary Grant
As written, does not assert sufficient notability. Delete as written. --Nlu (talk) 15:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I expanded the article. They are both notable. They won a major prize, the Balzan Prize for Population Biology. They were the subject of a book which won a Pulitzer Prize. And of course, they have done notable scientific work about the evolution of finches. It is rarely worthwhile to nominate an academic for deletion on the grounds of not being notable enough. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 16:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per the revisions to the article by TruthbringerToronto. Even before those edits I would have disagreed with the assertion put forward by the nominator - the stub template was an adequate means of addressing the apparent problem. Agent 86 17:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.