Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petpet

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. Postdlf 04:06, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Petpet
Non-Notable, advertising. &#1090;&#601; z&#1108; &#1090;&#1110;  20:00, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is a stub. It is valid. It is just a subgroup of Neopets. Give this article some time. Kingturtle 20:37, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect just as I did before. Neopets. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 20:54, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neopetcruft. Nestea 21:31, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Improve upon and Redirect. Hmib 01:37, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. This is just as valid as the pages on the various Pets.  Grev 02:57, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * There are no pages on individual pets. They were all merged into List of Neopets. &mdash; Xezbeth 06:29, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand.--Prem 06:26, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, or merge somewhere. &mdash; Xezbeth 06:29, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * If someone promises that next week won't see "petpetpet" then I'll join the keep and expand constituency.--Simon Cursitor 20:33, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I think that the Neopets main article has a better definition than this article currently does.  &#1090;&#601; z&#1108; &#1090;&#1110;   03:27, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Adding a list of the Petpets (but not in great detail) wouldn't be too bad. --Idont Havaname 00:39, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.