Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petroleum Economist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  06:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Petroleum Economist

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced for over a decade Chidgk1 (talk) 06:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I see the article was created by an SPA. Mccapra (talk) 13:17, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete the magazine exists, but most of the prose in the article is unsourced and I can't find anything to support notability. Oaktree b (talk) 23:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.