Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petros Shoujounian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. J04n(talk page) 11:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Petros Shoujounian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article does not seem to be notable - the few links included are not to reliable sources, by any definition of "reliable". Note also that the article was written by a user of the same name, who put the same text on his user page. He left a comment on the talk page saying that it shouldn't be deleted because it's his autobiography. Ypnypn (talk) 00:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * After having seen the revision mentioned below, I hereby change my stance to neutral; I still have doubts about the added sources. – Ypnypn (talk) 02:01, 17 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep and trim way back, based only on what reliable sources say. I see significant coverage of this composer and his work in the Toronto Star, Washington Post, St. Louis Post-Dispatch and Opera Canada.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  00:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Self-promotion of someone that isn't notable. METOKNOWONLY (talk) 02:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Welcome new users to Wikipedia. Can you expand please on how he promoted himself into that encyclopedia mention? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:38, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment This person may be a notable person. But a self promotion is not allowed in WP. Besides the article is too lengthy (28kB) and it is not properly sourced. Maybe a shorter article may be rewritten by another contributer with more reliable sources. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has no current sources to indicate notability. Must follow the principle of delete first, edit later WP:NRSNVNA if sources do exist.  It also appears to be WP:AUTOBIO DavidTTTaylor (talk) 17:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Welcome new users to Wikipedia. But that is not how AfD works. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:38, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep He is notable enough. However, the article is a mess. I am going to work on it. Please give me some time. Proudbolsahye (talk) 01:02, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Update Please take a look at the revision I did of the article and reassess your votes accordingly. Thank you. Proudbolsahye (talk) 01:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per discography apart from anything. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:38, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, referencing and coverage appears to be good (it would be nice to have a link to the Toronto Star / Peter Goddard article).   PK  T (alk)  19:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 19:59, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep given Proud's update – SJ + 02:21, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.