Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pfargtl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete per consensus; CSD A1 also applies. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Pfargtl

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Violates WP:NEO, 0 Google hits. Punkmorten 21:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable neologism. I'd note, for reference, that this word is apparently considered too minor for the Homestar Runner wiki. JavaTenor 00:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. Someone's redirected this; I've reverted it for the AfD no I haven't, someone beat me to it —  irides centi   (talk to me!)  00:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete or speedy redirect. Not sure if anyone would ever even search for this word, let alone use it for information. (I made/reverted the redirect by the way). --Wafulz 00:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, someone mentioned only once in email? No. The best would be redirect, if you understand what it means. BuickCenturydriver   (Honk, contribs)  00:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB, not notable.--Dacium 00:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, useless, non-notable. The picture dominates moset of the article and the rest of it is useless informaton Elfin341 01:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; fails WP:NEO and WP:WEB. Delete corresponding image. - Chardish 01:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD A1. Sr13 (T|C) 02:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn-neologism. —dima/talk/ 03:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete  Jody B   03:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, not notable per WP:FICTION. -- Kinu t /c  04:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no redirect, until it proves itself to be a meme on the level of fhqwhgads. I doubt it will. JuJube 04:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- per WP:NEO Thunderwing 19:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism without reliable secondary sources. Jay32183 20:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.