Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phalloides


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 19:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Phalloides

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete per the well-argued consensus at Articles for deletion/Tristis (2nd nomination) (2020).

If this page is deleted, Phalloides (disambiguation) should be deleted per WP:G14.

Consider adding phalloides to List of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names. Narky Blert (talk) 18:38, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Done! Elemimele (talk) 19:41, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Delete as none of these dab entries is ever referred to by just the species epithet alone. Loopy30 (talk) 16:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and Disambiguations.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm in two minds. I'm okay with delete on this specific list, but I think it's really important this doesn't become a campaign to delete (willy-nilly?!) all list articles concerning Latin words used as species names. For example, Officinalis is a well-written list of considerable encyclopaedic value, and Palustris isn't bad. The main objections to Phalloides is that it's really only useful to a handful of people interested in mycological smuttiness, and the list is too small to be particularly useful. Elemimele (talk) 19:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.