Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pham the hung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Pham the hung

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO JMHamo (talk) 11:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. Needs reliable citations so we can determine he existed, but if he did and he held the positions listed then he may be notable. Needs renaming though. The current title makes him sound like a cartoon character! -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to move it while discussion is open, but per MOS:CAPS the correct title here is Phạm Thế Hùng. Bearcat (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Most of the "references" here are links to the Vietnamese Wikipedia; the two that aren't are to a personal family tree site for an ancestor of his, and to a government site. In other words, not a valid reliable source in the bunch. Delete unless real sourcing can be found and added; no prejudice against future recreation if somebody can write a good and referenced new version. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to be a run of the mill civil servant. I'm sure he was very good at his job and a lovely person, but Wikipedia is not a memorial.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.