Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phanfare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources have been provided for over a week, no one has rebutted that they amount to significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Jenks24 (talk) 15:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Phanfare

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Taking this to AfD due to recent disputes as to notability. I am going to go with a very weak delete, as notability seems to be somewhat dubious. All given sources appear to be either first party sources or unreliable sources. If somebody can find some decent third party reliable sources, I would be happy to withdraw this nomination. Safiel (talk) 06:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 23.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note I transcluded this properly, but sometime later, somebody screwed up the log, removing a bunch of tranclusions. Thank god for bots that fix everything. :) Safiel (talk) 16:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as still nothing actually convincing for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  20:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

 References  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep – The topic meets WP:WEBCRIT and WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. Many of these sources were easily found using the Find sources template atop this nomination. North America1000 03:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * PC Magazine
 * TechCrunch
 * USA Today
 * PC Magazine
 * Digital Photography for Next to Nothing. John Wiley & Sons.
 * The Wall Street Journal

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 21:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - the sources linked by look to creep by WP:GNG &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 04:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * keep as per sources found by NorthAmerica.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 'Delete' as I agree with concerns of SwisterTwister  89.100.120.104 (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC) — 89.100.120.104 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * See WP:GNG. North America1000 05:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.