Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phantasmat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Phantasmat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've failed to find any evidence of notability. The article cites three sources: 1 was published by the maker of the product, 2 gives a "not found" message, and 3 does not mention the subject. Maproom (talk) 20:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: 1st relist

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  04:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - the subject's own home page and two gamer reviews are insufficient to support notability.--Rpclod (talk) 12:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 21:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * delete - Actually looks like many games under the same banner metacritic and GameRankings brought up zero reviews. Is only WP:ITEXISTS.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.