Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PharmaRusical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 05:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

PharmaRusical

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Stub that is unlikely to pass WP:NEPISODE and WP:GNG. There is little information that goes beyond a synopsis of the episode. It has sat as a stub for several months. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{  Talk  }- 18:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. I wish Lil-unique1 had expressed concerns on the article's talk page or at WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race before nominating for deletion. I believe there's enough sufficient secondary coverage to flesh out this entry and vote to keep for further expansion. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * We do not create articles on the "expectation of notability" or "future notability when someone gets around to expanding it". The mainspace is not for drafts or partially complete articles. That's what sandboxes and the user space is for. We do not need articles for the sale of articles. Additionally, its not just about the lack of detail on the page, page views show it is unlikely that readers will find/come to the page. They're much more likely to find the information on the parent season's page. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The main space is not for partially complete articles? Are you kidding? Wikipedia is full of incomplete articles. Nor do page views speak to notability. Next time try assessing secondary coverage WP:BEFORE nominating. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a valid reason for keeping something. We have notability rules for a reason - to establish what is factual and warrants an individual article. In this case, the article serves no purpose in its current format as it duplicates what is already at the parent season's page. I search news sources and felt what was available still would not make the topic eligible for its own page per WP:NEPISODE. Page views are a good indication of whether a sub-topic is worthy of existing as a separate page or not. Yes low or high views do not necessarily indicate whether or not something is notable but they provide a good indication for how audiences are accessing content about a particular topic. That's the bit I'm most interested in - making it as easy as possible for casual viewers to find the information. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 19:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Sitting as a stub is not a valid deletion reason; please review WP:IMPATIENT. As for notability, the subject has coverage currently used on the page from Billboard, A.V. Club, Vulture, and Metro Weekly. Coverage not used on the article in its current form includes In Magazine here; Wussy Mag here; Pajiba here; and others. --Kbabej (talk) 20:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Go  Phightins  !  11:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Multiple in-depth sources clearly establishes GNG. Macktheknifeau (talk) 13:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.