Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pharma Medica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Pharma Medica

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:ORGCRIT:


 * A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.


 * These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals. The guideline, among other things, is meant to address some of the common issues with abusing Wikipedia for advertising and promotion. As such, the guideline establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than for sources that are allowed as acceptable references within an article.

Pursuant to the above, the sources I gathered were all company announcements: no significant coverage. बिनोद थारू (talk) 03:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Canada. बिनोद थारू (talk) 03:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Technology.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Originally a WP:SPA article in 2015, and substantially unchanged since, despite various IP edits, etc. The given references are routine listings, announcement of the company purchasing software, and several items around the announcement of the opening of a Missouri site which appears to have subsequently closed: none of these are substantial coverage under WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches also find some coverage of a legal action, but nothing to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.