Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pharmacy Building


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 02:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Pharmacy Building

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is not a dab page. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems ok as a disambiguation page to me, I don't really understand the noms reasoning here. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 *  Keep  as above unless the nom explains their reasoning a bit more. AfD isn't the place for minimalism... ;D  one brave  monkey  09:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Explanation. As far as I can see, the second entry is a partial title match. It might be shortened to "Institute of Pharmacy Building", but nowhere in the article is it called just the "Pharmacy Building". I didn't notice that the first entry does qualify, but that still leaves the page with nothing to disambiguate. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I see where you're coming from now. In that case I'd support Delete, unless there's any specific reason that the first building warrants a redirect (who has to call it the "Pharmacy Building" for that to be a valid redirect?) .  one brave  monkey  09:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Leslie L. Dan Pharmacy Building per nom. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Inappropriate and unnecessary dab page. Every partial title match does not require a disabmiguation.   DGG ( talk ) 06:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per above on partial title match. Derild  49  21  ☼  00:09, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.