Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pharting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Pharting
Interesting concept, but completely original research / terminology, see  Oscar The Cat talk  18:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 19:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Shame, as it's a well written article, and a lot of time has gone into it. If only it had been published elsewhere. Weak delete  James  Kendall   [talk] 21:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR and WP:V and yeah it is a shame because it is a well written article... just not sourced or verifable.--Isotope23 21:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Anyone know of a WikiBook that would benefit from the addition of this information?  Ikkyu2 22:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Researching this, within the boundaries of the law, would make a great Wikinews article. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 01:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research. Pegasus1138 06:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.