Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phasael II


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Herodian dynasty. I'm redirecting it to Herodian dynasty since it's the only solid option presented. If you want to redirect it to another page, please go for it by changing the redirect on the page. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 22:42, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Phasael II

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Despite the numbers after his name, Phasael II was not a ruler. He was a nephew of Herod the Great who never reigned. All the information we have about him is genealogical so he definitely isn’t notable. This belongs in a family tree and not in a stand alone article. Mccapra (talk) 06:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom.67.173.23.66 (talk) 04:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to the appropriate article containing family tree information mentioned above. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I've no objection to a redirect, but the subject of this article is so insignificant that he is not even included in Herodian dynasty. Mccapra (talk) 09:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment If it's to be redirected, perhaps it could be to his father or his wife's page. At the very least, there doesn't seem to be support for keeping as a standalone article. 2601:241:300:B610:2030:B1E1:1C89:3527 (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.