Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phase 100


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 08:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Phase 100

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This page appears to be spam. There are no reliable sources from multiple non-trivial sources which would demonstrate notability. Jody B  talk 04:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Products aren't inherently notable. WP:SPAM /Blaxthos 16:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable advertorial.  Adrian  M. H.  17:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It's not spam—MXR's been out of business for years. Still, unless the someone were to add considerable content (with sources), there's not much of a point to it. Closenplay 18:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I would not hold that guitar pedals are individually notable. The company that made them might be, but given that they are long since extinct even that is debatable. A1octopus 18:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.