Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phaseolus vulgaris 'Tongue of Fire'


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Phaseolus vulgaris. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Phaseolus vulgaris &

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously proposed for speedy deletion. Fails WP:GNG and lacks notability for cultivars. 68.148.186.93 (talk) 10:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment Completing nomination on behalf of the above IP editor. I offer no opinion of my own at this time. -- Finngall   talk  17:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to the main bean article: Phaseolus vulgaris as this is a cultivar variety among many others. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 17:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge with Phaseolus vulgaris: No need for a separate article when the main article contains a detailed list of cultivars with room for the salient information presented here. Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge with Phaseolus vulgaris - Agree with the others that it does not pass our notability guidelines on it's own, while it can have place in the main article. DeVerm (talk) 18:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.