Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pheia pyrama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ per WP:SKCRIT. No policy-based reason for deletion was advanced. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 07:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Pheia pyrama

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Very little information available about the species online. Aydoh8 (talk) 04:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and South America. Aydoh8 (talk) 04:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NSPECIES. Jfire (talk) 04:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NSPECIES.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 04:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Please have a look at the responses to Articles for deletion/Clivina jodasi and desist from any more of these nominations. (Also note that there is always at least an original description) -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as no valid deletion rationale has been advanced. Wikipedia is not merely a recapitulation of things that are easy to Google anyway. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep WP:CSK &mdash;siro&chi;o 06:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.