Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phenomenal Literature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 17:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Phenomenal Literature

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mildly promotional article for new magazine, no independent sources with in-depth coverage, does not meet WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - This journal is still in its first volume and lacks coverage in independent sources. It might become notable at some point, but it isn't yet. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:50, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - As WP:TOOSOON - Only one issue to date, and no way to assess whether it will become notable in time, or even release the second issue. - Arjayay (talk) 13:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Both as too soon, and as part of a promotional campaign by its publisher  DGG ( talk ) 02:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as my searches found nothing for any of these publications. SwisterTwister   talk  06:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Unable to find any reliable sources for the article. Elaenia (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.