Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil's bbq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Phil's bbq
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not sure whether this is notable or not... Calvin 1998 (t-c) 07:45, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- No. No it isn't. Makes no assertion of notability; it's not enough that something merely exists. Reyk  YO!  09:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Dellete probably a great place to eat, I'd love to try it. Do they deliver?  Not notable.  DANG!--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no claim to be notable --T-rex 00:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Although I like that it does have authentic style barbecue and an all-around jovial atmosphere. If even one cusomer visits there this week as a result of this article, author will have accomplished the purpose of using Wikipedia for free advertising.  But what will you do next week?  Mandsford (talk) 00:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is lacking, as per previous observations -- however, I would gladly consider changing my vote if Phil sends over a pulled pork sandwich and some onion rings! :) Ecoleetage (talk) 04:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, and suggest you all take this into account. this shows that they've won a notable award (and apparently 3 times in a row according to the resteraunts website, although that should be taken with a pinch of salt). Surely that's grounds for inclusion. Ironholds 15:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * comment, I'm not too sure how notable this award makes the restaurant as it is a local acknowledgment of restaurants in San Diego only. Additionally, I mean come on they rated PF Chang's the top Asian restaurant?  Many of these "restaurant association" ratings are voted on by members or board members of the organization and they have a particular bias which makes the award somewhat dubious at times.  I'm sure it is a great restaurant but greater notability is needed.--Chef Tanner (talk) 17:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as per my comment above.--Chef Tanner (talk) 17:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.