Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Airey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Phil Airey

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is about a footballer who fails both WP:GNG and WP:ATHLETE. This is because he has made no professional appearances, and has no other claim to notability. Pretty Green (talk) 10:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NSPORTS as there is no evidence of a first team appearances.  Movementarian (Talk) 10:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Player recently promoted to first team squad but yet to make an appearance in competitive fixture. Fails ATHLETE, only general sports journalism failing NTEMP, fails GNG. Premature. Recreate if and when. -- Club Oranje T 11:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as original PRODer, fails both WP:ATH and WP:GNG. --Jimbo[online] 16:37, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 23:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 23:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comments. Mo ainm  ~Talk  13:05, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete' - No professional appearances and nothing written about him (sans the article linked to - which is on the Newcastle website) means he fails both Wp:ATHLETE and Wp:GNG. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  15:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.