Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Catudal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Phil Catudal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite the abundance of “References” observed in the article, subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them hence does not satisfy WP:GNG. He is an author but also doesn’t satisfy WP:AUTHOR. Celestina007 (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as likely paid-for spam. I've blocked the creator for this. MER-C 13:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete an overly promotional rubbish article. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn or Who's Who although some try to twist it to be one or the other.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:MILL, WP:GNG, and WP:SPAM. Regardless of the wall of references, this is an ordinary job/wellness coach with a fancy title they gave themselves. This blatant spam might have been excused in 2007, but in 2020, everybody knows we are a charity, not LinkFACESpace. Bearian (talk) 15:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.