Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Chalmers (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Phil Chalmers
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Subject is non-notable and questionable references within the article point primarily to the subject's own website. Article has been tagged as an orphan for a year now and was previously deleted in October 2008 as non-notable.  B.Rossow ·  talk  03:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 01:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources, no real notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep. There is actually a fair amount of coverage if someone wants to work on the article, which is in pretty bad shape.  I found several news paper stories that look relevant and reasonably substantial.          There are plenty of other passing mentions and so I think that a policy compliant article can be written.  I have no interest in reworking the current version though so my keep remains week.  Eluchil404 (talk) 03:10, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.