Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Comeau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) clpo13(talk) 17:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Phil Comeau

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for CSD G11, however the awards section suggests that there may be just enough notability here to let the article stay - with a major rewrite. Before we get there though we need to determine if the article should stay. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  12:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  12:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Yes, I've worked a bit on this article in the past and I can see why someone might have tagged it G11. However, among his awards, he's a member of the Order of Canada. It's the highest Canadian honour for civilian achievements (you wouldn't known it from its article, which is saddled with the usual monarchal crap from a certain editor) and his Ordre des Arts et des Lettres  from France is a pretty big one, too. Last but not least, the speedy nominator's "searches found nothing better" is baffling. A Gnews search for "Phil Comeau" yields good results: check it out. You've got to be able to read French, to be sure. He's a major Acadian filmmaker, whatever the problems with the article's tone. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I guess WP:ANYBIO is what I was looking for. The Order of Canada and Ordre des Arts et des Lettres alone would suffice, though he has other major honours, too.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:12, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:40, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


 * There's definitely some improvement needed here for both referencing and tone, I won't argue with that, but there's definitely notability there in principle — being named to the Order of Canada definitely counts toward notability, and there's notable film and television work in here. And I just did a ProQuest search, and did find some suitable articles to fix the referencing with there as well. Keep; I'll put some effort into cleaning it up. Bearcat (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I can help, too. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.