Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Konstantin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 15:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Phil Konstantin

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Seems to assert notability in a vague sort of way, but despite a host of sources about his lineage, his family, his time as a police officer, etc. the article doesn't indicate how he meets any of the WP:BIO criteria. Simply writing a couple of books does not mean one needs a Wikipedia article. If someone can rescue this, by all means feel free, but I'm not finding a whole lot out there. Kafziel Complaint Department 01:15, 10 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:34, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not conform to WP:BIO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RadManCF (talk • contribs) 01:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 18:47, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep/improve There is some argument for notability under WP:AUTHOR because he has one book published by a notable publisher (Da Capo Press) and was involved in the notable For Dummies series. If his NASA involvement could be backed up with reliable sources the article could also satisfy WP:BIO but I am also finding little to go on. Perhaps the article could be reconfigured toward his status as an author, where there is a little more notability to work with. Doomsdayer520  (Talk|Contribs) 12:56, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.