Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Kuehn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 18:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Phil Kuehn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails WP:BASIC, WP:CREATIVE, and WP:SINGER. Lots of name dropping but nothing substantive about the subject. Sources are promotional and hugely fail RS. A Google did not yield anything that rings the notability bell. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 23:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom. MrScorch6200  (talk &#124; ctrb) 06:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, not notable Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are lots of musicians, but we only include the notable ones in Wikipedia. The references don't prove notability, and when I googled Phil Kuehn on DuckDuckGo.com (which is better for googling than other search engines, because it doesn't sort results in order of your own personal interests) I didn't find anything that suggested that this guy is doing anything notable. He's just a working musician, but that's not what we're looking for in Wikipedia. RomanSpa (talk) 13:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NMUSIC. Can't find any Reliable third party sources.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  18:44, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.