Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Lines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Phil Lines

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This bio has multiple independent sources but the article subject is a senior media manager and the refs really consist of PR from him about his next appointment. Given his position I’m not sure this really demonstrates notability. Mccapra (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 00:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the coverage is particularly in-depth and two of the sources don't even focus on him. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.