Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Mondiello


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --Daniel Olsen 06:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Phil Mondiello


Seems to fail WP:BIO. If the Pokemon stuff was notable there'd be external coverage. (There isn't.) The rest is Youtubecruft. Crystallina 04:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Crufty. MER-C 05:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - goes well beyond cruft and reads more like WP:SPAM and WP:VAIN - wtfunkymonkey 06:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above. Movementarian (Talk) 06:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Delete per nom U-Tubecruft   SkierRMH, 07:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO. Hello32020 14:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete failing WP:BIO. —   pd_THOR  undefined | 22:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - WP:NOT, WP:BIO and fancruft. Sadly the third one isn't cause enough in its own right ;) Pete Fenelon 00:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.