Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Rainford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to The Durutti Column. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Phil Rainford

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Possible WP:ATD is redirect or merge/redirect to Factory Records, but it may unbalance that article. Boleyn (talk) 18:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 02:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to The Durutti Column. Seeing as what little about the band has come up mentions how obscure it is, I think we can safely consider the odds of an individual member being notable rather dismal. Mach61 (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - I suspect he is probably a keep based on his role as producer of two Nico albums and engineer of a third. I'd tread lightly, in any event. Carrite (talk) 03:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Carrite’s argument above. Llajwa (talk) 18:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge to The Durutti Column. Both the article content and the target will be improved by the merge. As a stand alone BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk  02:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.