Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Schwarzmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 16:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Phil Schwarzmann

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. No indication that subject meets topical notability guidelines for authors. Cind.  amuse  (Cindy) 11:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Ok so this would mean I need to provide extra media coverage for Schwarzmann's book rather than just a publishers website? --Portions100 (talk) 11:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent sources WP:RS to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Googling, I couldn't find anything useful.  Msnicki (talk) 21:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete nn b/c search revealed no 3rd party refs/mentionsCurb Chain (talk) 05:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.