Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Verity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to  Mazars. No evidence of independent notability j⚛e deckertalk 19:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Phil Verity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I declined a A7 speedy on this because there is one (barely) reliable source about him, but that's not really enough for him to be notable, and there don't appear to be any other suitable sources that mention him anywhere. We're left with a fairly insignificant CEO of a fairly insignificant company. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   17:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete we do have an article on the chairman of the same company, Patrick de Cambourg, who seems notable. I'm not quite sure we need a microstub for the deputy CEO though, considering the sourcing looks poor. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mazars - After multiple searches, I have only found three results here (provides a little bit of information about him), here (mentions his new position) and here (brief mentions). Although it seems he has worked with Mazars for several years and has a significant role there, I don't think there is enough for an article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  20:36, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge/redirect Mazars appears to be a 13000 member international accountancy firm. As such I would ahve expected its executives ("managing partners") to be at least on the firnges of notability.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:43, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Mazars. He needs independent notability, it is not transferred from Mazars (although that fact may form part of the justification for an article, it's not nearly sufficient for WP:N). In addition WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a legit argument. - Rushyo  Talk  18:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I still support Rushyo and others' proposal. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.