Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Wickham (entrepreneur)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The key is "several books" and "widely used." I am afraid neither applies here. JodyBtalk 22:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Phil Wickham (entrepreneur)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. I found coverage of the subject, but in blogs, which don't satisfy WP:RS. Other mentions of the subject are in relation to the subject's company, Kauffman Fellows Program. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Two of his books are used as textbooks in university syllabus per WP:PROF #4. Management Consulting and Strategic Entrepreneurship: He is President (and Fellow) of Kauffman Fellows Program which is a non-profit educational institution per PROF #6. His speaking engagements might qualify under PROF #1 (need to research). -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:44, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete His books are not widely held -- Strategic Entrepreneurship is in only 184 libraries, and Management consulting  in 84. That he is president of his own private educational institution is not notability ; The use of his books in courses is not clear; some are  universities totally unknown to me, some merely one of a long list of recommended reading, some only distance education projects of unknown importance, some small branches of universities.  That a person gives speeches is not proof of notability under WP:PROF or any other criterion. In this world, almost everyone capable of speaking gives speeches. There is no notability here, just promotion. I ry to use WP:PROF as widely as possible, but accepting this makes a joke out of WP:PROF.  DGG ( talk ) 04:21, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment According to WP:PROF #4 ".. may be satisfied, for example, if the person has authored several books that are widely used as textbooks (or as a basis for a course) at multiple institutions of higher education."
 * Chiang Mai University, book in course syllabus for MGMT 541
 * Universiteti i Prishtinës, book in course syllabus for "Entrepreneurship"
 * Grand Valley State University, textbook for course "Global Entrepreneurship" (pg. 20-21)
 * University of Wisconsin, textbook for course MGT 485 "Small Business Consulting"
 * University of Technology, Sydney, main/only textbook used for course 21228/15195020 Management Consulting (pg. 3)
 * York College of Pennsylvania, textbook for course ENT 450 "Small Business Consulting"
 * -- Green Cardamom (talk) 05:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * is that all you can find? It's trivial. I call that "scattered use", not "wide use".  DGG ( talk ) 00:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Syllabus' are ephemeral online documents, they come and go by their nature, this number is pretty good based on my experience of searching for syllabus', and it is global coverage. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 00:57, 13 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BASIC. The only news coverage I found was linked to a visit to Wales promoting his views/expertise. There seems to be no independently published information about the subject himself. -- Trevj (talk) 00:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.