Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philaesthoism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Philaesthoism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable art term. This term is used solely by a single artist (Sasikrishnan). No other artist has ever used this term to define their art. As such, this article should be deleted and replace with a redirect to the article about the author. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:09, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:30, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This is a terrible neologism for "love of beauty" (philocaly) that doesn't even deserve a redirect to Sasikrishnan. Per WP:NEO. Mduvekot (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Pernom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As non-notable and possibly used to promote the artist. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I also encountered this when it started and this may simply need to be restarted when better is available. SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.