Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philalawyer (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Philalawyer
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of meeting WP:BIO, can't find much in google, sources shown are unreliable or borderline spam, very close to an A7, had an earlier AFD closed as delete (with no comments though) Delete Secret account 06:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete spam lacking independent coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.