Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philamentology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Philamentology

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism that probably could lbe CSD-IAR'd without a second thought. The prod almost made it through the five day period, but was removed by an IP. NuclearWarfare  ( Talk ) 02:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a dictionary entry and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. It's also a false one.  It's not an actual word.  (Google Web gets it wrong, too, suggesting "philamatology" as an alternative spelling when one enters this non-word.)  The real name is philematology.  This is barely a sub-stub.  Either speedily redirect it or delete it, according to one's pleasure as to whether one thinks that people will make this same spelling error in future.  There's no way that an article belongs at this title. Uncle G (talk) 03:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I SD'ed it as nonsense, and nonsense it still is. §FreeRangeFrog 03:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as protologism. Doesn't seem to be a common search term, so I'd rather see it completely expunged.  Baileypalblue (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. Rawr. WillOakland (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and suggest snowball. Ddawkins73 (talk) 09:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Kiss under the premise that redirects are cheap, and maybe, maybe someone will spell philematology the same way in the future. No complaints with a deletion, however. fuzzy510 (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.