Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philatelic equity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Philatelic equity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Adds no value to stamp collecting and philately. No references and a non-neutral statement of opinion. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete It is certainly a personal analysis, largely unintelligible, by the author, essentially original research, and absolutely not notable, given that Google returns two hits, both of them gibberish, for this phrase. Largoplazo (talk) 10:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, Largoplazo puts it perfectly. MartinJones (talk) 17:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable topic with no sources that can be found to support it. ww2censor (talk) 21:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as something someone made up one day WP:MADEUP.Glendoremus (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   01:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.