Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philby (The Kingdom Keepers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Kingdom Keepers. Stifle (talk) 14:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Philby (The Kingdom Keepers)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of The Kingdom Keepers through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so any coverage in the main article is enough detail on the character. TTN (talk) 23:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to main article and request a protection if it doesn't stick. - Mgm|(talk) 00:05, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I was linked a disabiguation page... ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:24, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems that it was originally a dab page until September. It was reverted after the AfD was started. TTN (talk) 02:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy restore revision where it was a disambig page. Shyamal (talk) 02:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment was for the Philby page. Shyamal (talk) 07:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete (Philby (The Kingdom Keepers)) non notable Shyamal (talk) 07:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * merge and redirect Article's subject may not be notable, but individual pieces of information do not need to pass WP:N, just WP:V. --Kraftlos (talk) 04:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * comment Will the character referred to above be included in the disambig and linked to the parent article? ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The "Philby" which came to mind when I saw this title is the super-spy Kim Philby. Whether this is kept, deleted, merged or whatever, a pointer to that biography would be in order. Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note. The previous history of "Philby" as a disambiguation was undoubtedly valid. To prevent any further confusion arising from this, I have split out the history which has to do with The Kingdom Keepers character, and moved it to a new title. This AFD is updated to reflect that. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well done. Thank you. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Kingdom Keepers. A character which just appears in one trilogy does not need an entire article for himself. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect This seems reasonable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 09:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Kingdom Keepers, per the usual consensus for unremarkable fictional characters such as this. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.