Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philby Greenstreet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:32, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Philby Greenstreet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Although it has not been made clear in the article, the subject is merely a fictional character in a book by A.W. Hill a.k.a. Andy Hill (Music Supervisor) (see here). The references added by the creator of the above articles,, do not support the material he added. The character, the book, and the author/music supervisor all appear to fail the relevant notability guidelines due to lack of coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject. Location (talk) 21:04, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 20.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 21:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 03:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete fictitious or not there is no significant coverage, so it fails the general notability guidelines. The name appears to have been made up from that of the British spy Kim Philby and that of the actor Sydney Greenstreet who was so memorable as the villain in such films as The Maltese Falcon, Casablanca, Across the Pacific and Background to Danger.  The article reads as if its author lives in a universe where fiction becomes reality. I did not comment on  A.W. Hill or Andy Hill (Music Supervisor) as those articles were not marked for Afd discussion.  I suspect that they should be considered at some point. --Bejnar (talk) 06:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   21:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.