Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Fleishman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Philip Fleishman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rathfelder (talk) 18:58, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - - what's your reason for nomination? Bookscale (talk) 21:51, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * BLP without any external references. Rathfelder (talk) 22:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. BLP, written like a prosified résumé and "referenced" solely to a self-published press release from his own production company rather than any evidence of reliable source coverage about him. As always, people are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because their work technically metaverifies its own existence — the notability test for people is not the things the article says, but the depth and quality of the sources that can be shown to support the things it says, and just having a "production biography" in the self-published press kit of one of his own productions is not a notability-making source. Bearcat (talk) 22:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I could find no significant coverage of this individual on independent, reliable sources to show that he clears WP:GNG. A person with a job, WP:MILL. RetiredDuke (talk) 17:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.