Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Houston Bed and Breakfast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  14:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Philip Houston Bed and Breakfast

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The sources mentioned are unequivocal adverts and a page of the Kansas Bed&Breakfast Association. Independent coverage, and hence notability, is not established. Kleuske (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. It isn't notable as a bed and breakfast, but it is notable as an historic building. It is listed in the Kansas Register of Historic Places, but not in the National Register of Historic Places. Designation as a notable place counts as independent coverage. Once the AFD is finished, the article should be moved to the building name rather than the BnB name. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep the first three sources are not advertisements. Those references are to listings at the Kansas Historical Society, an organization that has long been considered a reliable source on Wikipedia.  Articles on such historical locations are normally kept.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Eastmain's comments. Hughesdarren (talk) 22:57, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep.  but rename to its proper historic name on the Reigister: John Housten Housen. the "bed and breakfast" poart is a modern promotional  addition--I see   came to the same conclusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)
 * comment good idea on the rename.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename per above .It is notable as a historic building but not as a  Bed and Breakfast.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.