Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip John Cichanowicz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 15:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Philip John Cichanowicz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I found one local piece written about the subject of this article via Google, but I'm not sure if that's enough for notability (the rest of the related links seem to be from the user's Youtube submissions.) I'm also not sure how important a "Scholastic Golden Key" award is for anything. Thanks. Rnb (talk) 02:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Found a duplicate entry: . --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 02:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both Not notable at all. I'd also point out that Phil Cichanowicz was speedily deleted.  User:Gordossvaa clearly created the two pages listed here to get around the speedy deletion. TheMile (talk) 02:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above user. Unknown User (talk) 03:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Per TheMile. Five Years 11:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Considering that this is a duplicate, go ahead and delete it. Gordossvaa (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.