Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Lynch (executive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 04:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Philip Lynch (executive)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

inadequate coverage to establish GNG. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTLINKEDIN. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTLINKEDIN is redirecting to WP:MEMORIAL. If you mean résumé, then it is not.Karieol51 (talk) 16:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Please follow MOS:LISTGAP. Thanks, —&thinsp; J 947 (user &#124; cont &#124; ess), at 01:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep held significant posts, has in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Karieol51 (talk) 16:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Link to the sources please. —&thinsp; J 947  (user &#124; cont &#124; ess), at 01:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Dom Kaos. --BlameRuiner (talk) 11:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.