Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip McCluskey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 09:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Philip McCluskey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no actual notability. The only remotely acceptable source is a local newspaper in Connecticu, & I do not think it enough to verify the claims made.  DGG ( talk ) 09:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks sufficient coverage in reliable sources. Mentioned in this book, but not much else found.--Michig (talk) 15:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, and WP:BIO. Qworty (talk) 01:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Please do not delete this article. McCluskey is a well-known figure within the raw food community, with a notable following (as an example, over 600,000 people have tuned in to his YouTube videos, and over 6,000 are subscribers to his channel). While traditional media coverage for this person may not be extensive, he is widely cited by peers and covered frequently within raw food circles (please see McCluskey's own press page at www.lovingraw.com/press for a more extensive list). --User: Irenadj (talk) 05:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - a quick search of him shows only blogs, twitter tweets and self published materials with no major third party sources that meet the standards of WP:PSTS. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 19:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.