Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Michael Jonathan Guiver


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW. Also per WP:CSD J.delanoy gabs adds  16:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Philip Michael Jonathan Guiver

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declined speedy. Non-notable artist, blatant autobiography. No sources cited, none found in my own search. While we're at it, there's also a redirect page, Philip guiver. Also this is the third time this page has been re-created, so I suggest both it and the redirect be create protected. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  —Beeblebrox (talk) 08:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  —Beeblebrox (talk) 08:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: This is one WP:NOTE delete that I can actually get behind. If he were able to reference something other then his MySpace page... Ω (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete (again), and Gabriel Rojas Hruska too. A walled garden is being created here. Dekimasu よ! 12:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I also doubt he realizes that he is putting his work that he wants to advertise onto Wikipedia under a free license. Someone might want to talk to both of them about that. Dekimasu よ! 12:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * (very) Good point... how? On his talk page? Isn't there a separate procedure for copyright violations, as well? Ω (talk) 12:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: The subject of this article is non-notable and it amounts to nothing more than self-promotion. - Ahunt (talk) 12:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable autobiography. Hairhorn (talk) 13:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

I've said this many times already, give me a fair amount of time so that I can cite some reasonable sources, which I do not have access to right now. Do you people seriously have nothing better to do all day? Steven w. black (talk) 13:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This is the third time this has been posted. I don't see any imminent changes in notability: he's still an art student. (Also, are you sure you want to release the copyright on your own paintings?) Hairhorn (talk) 14:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'd recommend speedy deletion because I don't see any notability assertion in the article, but if it's already been declined, I guess I'm missing something. Rnb (talk) 14:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, this should be moved to CSD under Criteria 11 - it is just promotion. - Ahunt (talk) 15:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Just checking the logs - this article was already CSD as A7 once this morning and immeditely recreated. It can still be A7ed. - Ahunt (talk) 15:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.