Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Scholz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  06:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Philip Scholz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am the subject of the article Philip Scholz and I wish to see it removed. The information is out-of-date and no longer relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swimfan0412 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC) — Swimfan0412 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. Anon IP editors claiming to be the subject have repeatedly tagged the article for deletion. The were asked to take the issue to OTRS. • Gene93k (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I was not aware of those messages. In any case, I am the original author of this article 204.126.240.6 (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)swimfan0412
 * I would still like to see this removed as per my reasons stated above. 204.126.240.6 (talk) 14:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)swimfan0412
 * Keep Notability is not temporary. So as a Paraolympian - winning and even having set records there is no reason to delete the article. What I do understand is that random outdated details of the subjects personal life which have no bearing on his Olympian career should go, and I have trimmed the article accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agathoclea (talk • contribs) 09:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being out of date is not a reason for deletion. If there was entirely untrue information, and hence WP:BLP concerns that would be a different matter but as it stands this is an article on a clearly notable athlete which merely requires a bit of updating and tidying - Ba se me nt 12  (T.C) 09:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: All it needs cleanup, not deletion. The subject is notable. Ayub 407 talk 08:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.