Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Tanasas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Philip Tanasas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable “tik tok” celebrity that lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus falling short of GNG. Furthermore it should be noted that fame/popularity aren’t one and the same with notability. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator explanation. Wretchskull (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment —@, thanks for your contribution, I take it that you agree with my nom rationale but unfortunately, you may either !vote a keep, weak keep, delete, strong delete and a speedy delete. !voting a support may not be regarded nor recognized by the closing admin. At this juncture, you may have to change your !vote from a support to a delete instead. Thanks for your contributions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Closing administrators can read. &#9786;  "Support removal" is clear even to me.  It's not about the boldfaced words.  Uncle G (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @, 😂. Celestina007 (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I find one interview he did with ABS-CBN, more of a "man on the street" interview really, not sure how notable that makes him. Oaktree b (talk) 00:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @, very much correct, I saw that too but an interview isn’t independent of the subject thus is of no value to GNG which requires in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 01:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The page doesn't have enough info to be notable.  Zai  (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 00:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment — @, thanks for your contribution, I take it that you agree with my nom rationale but unfortunately, you may either !vote a keep, weak keep, delete, strong delete and a speedy delete. !voting a support may not be regarded nor recognized by the closing admin. At this juncture, you may have to change your !vote from a support to a delete instead. Thanks for your contributions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment – @ Thank you. I've changed my vote to a !delete.  Zai  (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 12:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete There isn't any demonstration of notability in the sources provided. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete interviews do not count towards notability at all. This applies to any and all interviews. The sourcing here is not at all at the level we need to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG. Also drivel. KidAd  •  SPEAK  23:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, No sign of notability. Alex-h (talk) 10:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete There is a lack of information to be considered as notable, so it definitely fails WP:GNG. Idunnox3 (talk) 01:24, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definite lack of RS. No signs of notability. --Kbabej (talk) 17:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced.   scope_creep Talk  13:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.