Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Voss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 20:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Philip Voss

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Possibly a straight CSD per A7 since only claim of notability is him being in a probably non-notable TV series, itself standing for deletion. No significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Meets no other inclusion criteria at WP:BIO. Jay Σεβαστός discuss  10:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 18:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Comment I've added links in the article to seven other articles, each of which legitimately refers to him in a part probably too small to be notable - but I'd like others to judge. (I'm almost tempted by cases like these to suggest a List of non-notable actors, to which links like these could be redirected.) PWilkinson (talk) 19:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I created the article, he's had some coverage from theatre company websites which I've added, and there's also a BBC source confirming his involvement in an audio drama and another for Doctor Who. I would leave up to consensus to determine whether he is notable or not, however the deletion review for Fish looks like it'll be revoked and there seems to be evidence of extensive theatrical credits. Black-Velvet  02:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Certainly notable.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The references since provided make him notable. One source is in fact his home page which I have put in the External links section and formatted the others. Mark   Dask  15:51, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - lots of little parts can add up to notability per WP:CREATIVE. Bearian (talk) 19:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per meeting WP:ENT, and continue improvements. Not done yet, no, but I am finding that his work in theater has received positive critical acclaim. More to do... more to do.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:56, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.